If you want to know about GoogleTV, this is the place to find out what it is. There seems to be great confusion about what GoogleTV actually is, so I thought I'd write about it so others could benefit.
So what is GoogleTV? In order to better explain what GoogleTV is, it is important to understand what it is not. GoogleTV is not:
Instead, GoogleTV is:
Google has partnered with various companies to ensure products are available for the consumer that will make finding and discovering remote content as simple as possible. The following are examples of hardware we can expect to see on the market:
As you can see, the GoogleTV software is designed to work with, not replace, the types of hardware in your home. All of the hardware in the home has a core function. Whatever the core function of the device, the device must be used for the purpose it is designed for. GoogleTV will not be able to change that. GoogleTV will not enable you to add a Blu-Ray drive to your television. You will need to purchase an independent Blu-Ray player. A GoogleTV enabled television will not let you avoid purchasing a multichannel audio receiver for the presentation of multichannel audio (with the exception of any speakers or sound processing capabilities already built into the television). Simply put, GoogleTV is only the software platform used by the hardware. Any hardware specific functions must be enabled in the device by the hardware manufacturer. Software, including GoogleTV, cannot add a hardware function to a device if the hardware function is not built into the device. However, software may be used to enhance a hardware feature that is already present.
So far, GoogleTV sounds like a great thing, right? Well here are the possible side affects and negative points of GoogleTV:
While the above things may seem very negative, there are many good points to GoogleTV. Some of these good points are:
Other companies have tried to marry the TV experience with the web experience, and all have failed. However, these companies tried to do it before there was such a high demand for web content. More recently, we have seen devices on the market that bring additional content to the home in the form of a separate source. Google has decided that having a separate source is not the way to go, as it does not allow for true integration of web content with traditional television content. Instead, Google has decided that the web content needs to be just as accessible as the traditional content, and users should not be restricted to what content they can see, provided that such content is available.
It's hard to say if GoogleTV will be successful. GoogleTV may or may not be right for you. There's one thing we can all be sure of: Google is an ever expanding company that has set its sights on a new place to have a presence, and that's exactly where the company wants to be.
ChiWaxI guess we will find out the new standard for "seamlessly". Q.
It remains to be seen if Google uses the same dictionary as the rest of us.
richard1980ChiWaxI guess we will find out the new standard for "seamlessly". Q. It remains to be seen if Google uses the same dictionary as the rest of us.
richard1980GoogleTV is a method for delivering content, including advertisements. Since Google's primary source of income is from advertising revenue, GoogleTV users should expect to see advertisements included in most, if not all, content;
GoogleTV is a method for delivering content, including advertisements. Since Google's primary source of income is from advertising revenue, GoogleTV users should expect to see advertisements included in most, if not all, content;
capitalfWith Microsoft recently starting to embed Windows 7 Media Center on devices, I doubt it'll be long before we see them get into this same set top box, TV, etc internet TV market. They already have their name well known by a pretty good fan base of WMC, Windows and Xbox users when it comes to home media streaming. Google TV and us all need the competition.
capitalfVery well-written post. However, I'd like to disagree or at least comment on this: richard1980 GoogleTV is a method for delivering content, including advertisements. Since Google's primary source of income is from advertising revenue, GoogleTV users should expect to see advertisements included in most, if not all, content; While Google started with search and advertisements, I believe it's safe to say they've moved far beyond it. A lot of people have a misconception that Google TV will be ridden with ads. Personally, I think you'll encounter less ads while using Google TV than you do on traditional TV. An hour broadcast on traditional TV includes ~15 minutes of commercials. In contrast the same broadcast on the internet might present less than half of that. Furthermore, Google TV won't include any more ads than an application, web site, or video ALREADY has. Just look at Android (which Google TV is built on). You see apps in applications, content and web sites only. Android itself isn't flooded with a single advertisement. Sure, developers could put a nice ad on your phone dialer to make some cash, but they don't because it's distasteful and would drive away people to use another Android phone. Google and developers will treat Google TV the same way.
richard1980 GoogleTV is a method for delivering content, including advertisements. Since Google's primary source of income is from advertising revenue, GoogleTV users should expect to see advertisements included in most, if not all, content;
You may find the following article interesting: http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2010/tc20100523_438614.htm. If what the article says is true, advertisers seem to be in love with GoogleTV. Since Google is expecting to earn revenue from GoogleTV (that's what the article says), and this article has the Google CEO talking about how GoogleTV will allow for targeted advertising, I have to put two and two together and come up with the answer that Google's revenue source will be from selling targeted advertisements. However, the exact implementation remains a mystery at this time. Google has already been involved in the television ad industry, with their service Google TV Ads (http://www.google.com/tvads), so I don't think it's unreasonable to expect to see an interactive advertisement for a Hershey's candy bar in the middle of an episode of Law & Order on NBC. Not only would NBC receive money from Hershey's for running the regular commercial, but Google would then benefit from the interactive portion of the ad. While it would technically be possible for Google to offer advertisements at the exact same time content is being watched, I don't think they will allow it. The developer's site for GoogleTV states "Don't interrupt when users are watching TV. Instead, make the viewing experience better." I don't understand what they really mean by "make the viewing experience better", but to me "Don't interrupt when users are watching TV" means don't do anything that will impact the user when TV is being watched, including showing them advertisements. However, the statement could be construed to mean "Don't display additional content on top of the content the user is trying to view", meaning the viewing area could be reduced to allow for advertising in the borders. This is especially beneficial to web-based content, as most web-based content is of lower quality and benefits from being shown in a smaller viewing space. Have you ever tried to watch SD YouTube videos on a 65-inch plasma TV? They don't look very good. Scaling the video size down would not only make the video appear to look better, but more screen space would be available for other content, which content providers (or even Google) could use for advertising purposes. Some people may think this makes the overall viewing experience better. GoogleTV gives advertisers the potential to earn a lot of money, and advertisers have historically paid lots of money for that potential.
I don't know if we will see any more advertising with GoogleTV. With Google being so secretive, it's really hard to say. I would like to think that we wouldn't, but you never know. If anything, I think it's safe to say we won't be seeing any less.
First off, thanks for the overview and a very well written one at that, but...
You keep saying it isn't this and it isn't this, etc... It doesn't replace existing hardware. Well neither does a Windows 7 CD. It is just software. It depends on what you do with it.
It is a platform and it is extendible and can be embedded in all sorts of devices. I don't see why someone couldn't build a blu-ray player with digital tuners using the Google TV platform. Such a device could effectively replace my HTPC (except for MyMovies, but that could change... maybe?) and it would have added functionality provided by third-party developers.
What I don't see is BYOD type sistuation we have with Windows Media Center. Or at least it won't be supported. But no reason it couldn't be ported, but drivers would likely be the limiting factor.
I still don't understand why Microsoft hasn't pushed its media center as a platform for device manufacturers, content providers and third-party developers using Windows 7 embedded. I might give Balmer a call and see if he needs some help getting that going! There is serious opportunity in this marketplace and it is just waiting for someone to capture it. For advertising it is has huge potential and Google seems to see that and is going after it.
3vian
3vianFirst off, thanks for the overview and a very well written one at that, but... You keep saying it isn't this and it isn't this, etc... It doesn't replace existing hardware. Well neither does a Windows 7 CD. It is just software. It depends on what you do with it. It is a platform and it is extendible and can be embedded in all sorts of devices. I don't see why someone couldn't build a blu-ray player with digital tuners using the Google TV platform. Such a device could effectively replace my HTPC (except for MyMovies, but that could change... maybe?) and it would have added functionality provided by third-party developers. What I don't see is BYOD type sistuation we have with Windows Media Center. Or at least it won't be supported. But no reason it couldn't be ported, but drivers would likely be the limiting factor. I still don't understand why Microsoft hasn't pushed its media center as a platform for device manufacturers, content providers and third-party developers using Windows 7 embedded. I might give Balmer a call and see if he needs some help getting that going! There is serious opportunity in this marketplace and it is just waiting for someone to capture it. For advertising it is has huge potential and Google seems to see that and is going after it. 3vian
GoogleTV is no different than the firmware we currently find on Blu-Ray players, in the sense that it's just a piece of software. In order for GoogleTV to be installed on a device that is both a Blu-Ray player and a TV tuner, there must first exist a device that is a Blu-Ray player and TV tuner. GoogleTV doesn't change anything. GoogleTV doesn't make the process of building such a device any easier. No app developer will be able to make it any easier to accomplish such a build. Before the app developer can do anything, they must first have hardware to develop around.
3vian I don't see why someone couldn't build a blu-ray player with digital tuners using the Google TV platform.
You can't use the GoogleTV platform to develop the hardware...you incorporate GoogleTV into your current hardware. Substitute the word "computer" in place of "Blu-Ray player", the words "a printer" for "digital tuners" and "Windows Media Center" for "the GoogleTV platform". Now how does your statement read? "I don't see why someone couldn't build a computer with a printer using Windows Media Center". While building a computer that houses a printer may technically be possible, Windows Media Center is not what makes it happen. You build the hardware first, then choose a software platform (read "firmware") for running that hardware. If you want Windows Media Center, you choose a platform that includes Windows Media Center. If you want a certain hardware component to be accessible via Windows Media Center, you have to find a way to connect the hardware to the user. This is done by developing an application for the OS to connect to the hardware (think "driver"), then an application is created for WMC that performs two functions. First, it connects the driver to WMC, then it connects WMC to the user. The same concept applies to GoogleTV.
So it's going to take three pieces and three connections to solve the puzzle. The three pieces are: A piece of hardware; an app that runs in Android; and finally, an app that runs in GoogleTV. The connectors are: Hardware-to-Android; Android-to-GoogleTV; and GoogleTV-to-user. However, Google is not planning to allow that ability in the beginning. Here are some questions Google has answered in the developer FAQ:
Q. Will there be Android Market on Google TV? When will it be available A. Android market would be available on Google TV in early 2011. We will have more information to share about Android Market and an SDK add-on a few months after the first Google TV devices hit shelves this fall.
Q. Can I install Android applications from a URL? (since there is no Android Market) A. Application downloads will not be officially supported. Only pre-installed applications will be available at initial product launch.
Q. Will my existing Android apps work on Google TV? A. After we make Android Market available, your applications will work on Google TV unless they require a hardware or software feature not supported by Google TV. However, we hope developers will optimize their applications for TV to tap into the opportunities provided by a big screen and TV content.
Q. Can I download Google TV? When will it be open sourced? A. No, Google TV is only available pre-installed on Sony TVs and blu-ray players, as well as Logitech companion boxes. We are working hard to open source the code for the Google TV project, and hope to release the source code next year.
I think it's easy to see that GoogleTV is broken into two developer groups. First, there are the web developers...people that own internet-based content that gets presented to GoogleTV users. Then we have Android developers, where hardware specific functions are used. It appears GoogleTV will initially have a handful of Android apps provided by Google, but the bulk of the GoogleTV applications are going to end up coming from web developers. Until an app developer has access to both the Android source code (already possible) and the GoogleTV source code, development of hardware specific applications will not be possible.
What this all tells me is GoogleTV will initially ship designed to work with select Sony and Logitech hardware. If Sony or Logitech does not incorporate a specific hardware capability, then such a capability will not be possible. However, Android is already open source, and GoogleTV is expected to go open source as well. Therefore, hardware manufacturers can begin working on the hardware-to-Android connection now, and once GoogleTV goes open source, can then work on a way to finish the chain from hardware to user. However, the key thing to remember is, GoogleTV isn't what give you the hardware capabilities...it's the hardware itself that does. If a manufacturer doesn't include a digital tuner in their Blu-Ray player, GoogleTV isn't going to help you do that.
Also, the reason I explain what GoogleTV cannot do is because there are a lot of people asking "Can GoogleTV do this, can GoogleTV do that". There's a common misconception on TGB that GoogleTV somehow makes it possible to change the hardware configuration of a device, like add a TV tuner to a Blu-Ray player. Essentially, people are asking "Will the firmware on my TV will let me add a refrigerator to my TV?". Well, it may allow you to control a refrigerator if the TV already comes with refrigerator in it, but it only allows you to interact with the refrigerator, not add one to your TV. If your TV doesn't come with a refrigerator built in, it at least needs to have a port or hole or some other way to add a refrigerator before the firmware can interact with it.
3vianI still don't understand why Microsoft hasn't pushed its media center as a platform for device manufacturers, content providers and third-party developers using Windows 7 embedded. I might give Balmer a call and see if he needs some help getting that going! There is serious opportunity in this marketplace and it is just waiting for someone to capture it. For advertising it is has huge potential and Google seems to see that and is going after it.
I don't think this would be a wise move at this time. First, WMC is centered around it's DVR capabilities and playing local content. It's only recently that we've seen internet accessible content built into WMC. Second, Windows 7 embedded does not support CableCARD. I don't see much market potential for an embedded DVR device to receive a handful of digital channels and some less-than-ideal-quality analog channels. Perhaps such an idea would be successful in places that have better reception options, but in the United States I don't see the market. As a customer, I can pick up a TV tuner for my computer for next to nothing, and since I already have Windows 7, WMC, and a hard drive, there's really no need to spend more than maybe $100 on the solution...all I need is a TV tuner and a cable to connect the computer to my TV. Windows 7 embedded devices are likely to cost much more than that. For someone that doesn't already have a computer, an embedded solution would probably be a good thing, but the truth is, most of us already have a computer...a second computer is not necessary. Third, I would not purchase Windows, nor pay extra to get WMC, and then have to put up with advertising. I expect something like that out of a free program like MythTV, but not WMC. If MS starts something like that, they can forget about me as a WMC customer. I'll pay for the alternative.
Awesome post.
Here's an interesting link from Engadget, showing what appears to be a Sony Internet TV Box of some sort. Engadget thinks this could possibly be a GoogleTV device, although Google has only released Logitech's name as a manufacturer of such a device.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/01/sony-internet-tv-box-for-google-tv-revealed-by-the-fcc/
Ask and you shall receive...minus the GoogleTV part.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/02/sharp-plunges-headfirst-into-3d-market-with-lv-series-quattron-t/
Looks like Google has more plans than search result domination.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/29/youtube-courting-hollywood-for-pay-per-view-movie-service-by-end/